![]() ![]() I didn't notice any drag or tangling even when it wasn't placed in a bungee. The Pulsefire Haste’s braided USB cable also lived up to its promise. Pro players might notice more of a difference, but those of us in the middle of the rankings should be fine with the PAW 3335. Luckily, the Pulsefire Haste performed as expected in my competitive shooter of choice, Valorant, despite using a sensor that's slightly worse than what I'm used to. That means it's important to be able to aim precisely and quickly as reliably as possible. Responsiveness matters in every game, of course, but in shooters, a few pixels can make all the difference. Most ultra-lightweight mice are marketed specifically towards people who play first-person shooters. Why use an inferior sensor whose primary benefit is power efficiency in a wired mouse? Fortunately, that's an easy question to answer: The PAW 3335 is cheaper than the PMW 3389, and many won't notice the difference, especially since its performance is comparable to the now-somewhat-dated PMW 3360 (up to 12,000 CPI, 250 IPS and 50G) still found in other mice. The sensor’s specced for up to 16,000 CPI, a max velocity of 450 IPS and acceleration of 40g. HyperX opted for the PAW 3335, which PixArt markets as a "highly power-efficient sensor suitable for wireless gaming." Unfortunately, it's also technically inferior to the PMW 3389, which means it’s not exactly a top-tier sensor. Unlike many of its contemporaries, the Pulsefire Haste doesn't rely on the high-end PMW 3360 or 3389 sensors. Gaming Performance of HyperX Pulsefire Haste You also get one RGB lighting zone, which is under the scroll wheel and, therefore, typically visible even when you’re gaming. The Pulsefire Haste otherwise reads like many other ultra-lightweight mice: it has six customizable buttons via two primary buttons, two side buttons, a CPI switch and the scroll click. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |